06/29/16

Fourth Generation Warfare

Fourth Generation Warfare (4GW) also called Asymmetric Warfare by some is war or political fighting with unclear rules and unidentified fighters and non-fighters against state sponsored, organized, funded, and armed military components. Fourth Generation Warfare (4GW) was first coined in 1989 by William S. Lind and a team of United States political analysts to describe warfare’s return to its decentralized form.

First, second, and third generation wars historically were fought using clear methods. Each of the methods used in each generation was an escalation or advancement in technology from the previous generation. The intentions, goals, and rules of engagement were Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) by all involved sovereign states. Asymmetric Warfare is an example of 4GW. Asymmetric Warfare as defined by Lt. Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr, USMC, Director for Strategic Plans and Policy, J5 (Joint Chiefs of Staff) as: Leveraging inferior tactical or operational strength against American vulnerabilities to achieve disproportionate effect with the aim of undermining American will in order to achieve the asymmetric actor’s strategic objectives. It’s a mouthful, but basically it means affectively beating down tanks with sticks, tricks, rocks, and words.

Terrorism is 100%, absolutely in our country, and huge elements of it are pounding at America’s values and will. They are exploiting and breaking all our established Homeland Defense and combatant rules to get a foothold! They use “Lawfare”, media exploitation other similar asymmetric tactics to subvert, tax our time, and divert our focus from our own defense. The time to cease the conventional U.S. warfare model against this threat is now. The time to cease the “Open Borders” model is now! Our nation needs to adapt to, improvise against, and overcome this threat. We must adopt a more asymmetric warfare model that can neutralize the terrorist threat from abroad, and from imbedded elements within our country.

Nearly all of the terrorist events (claimed and unclaimed) in our country have been from radical Muslims throughout the world, and it’s time to start profiling them as such. It’s time to start calling them what they are, “Radical Muslims”! President Obama, his administration, and liberal democrats cannot bring themselves to say it because Obama is literally a sympathizing Muslim and he actually identifies with the radical jihadi philosophy. Informed Christians such as myself believe the Obama administration is engineering a civil war in our country, and ultimately, dissolution of Christianity to make way for his one world government, religion, and economy. Tell us what you think.

I will be discussing more about 4th Generation Warfare in a 3 part series starting next week, then I will end the series with a discussion on the Federalist Papers. The topics will be: Lawfare, Information Warfare, Media Warfare (propaganda), and end with The Federalist Papers.

Boats

 

06/18/16

The Orlando Terrorism Massacre

Democrat Liberal Stance on Orlando: This horrible tragedy in Orlando happened because we have no gun control laws. Anybody can buy automatic weapons in the U.S. with no background check. Christians are to blame for their radical stance on homosexuality. Republicans are to blame because of their poor stance on gun control. Radical Islam was not to blame for this (liberals are not allowed to use the words radical and Islam in the same sentence). The U.S. needs to be more like European countries. Gun control is proven and tested there. It’s the best thing for a safe environment here in the U.S., and will stop terrorism.

NRA Stance on Orlando: NRA stated that what happened in Orlando was not the fault of lax gun laws or poor gun control, but instead on the Obama administrations crippled understanding of human nature, and radical Islamic terrorism. Chris Cox, the executive director of the N.R.A. Institute for Legislative Action said “Gun laws don’t deter terrorists.” He expanded on this point, but generally it goes like this; The U.S. governments idiocy when it comes to following through and following up on suspects is lacking. Political correctness and failure to evaluate suspects using the profiling method allows terrorists to have terrorist operations unfettered in the U.S. The Obama administration and democrat liberals are to blame, not guns.

TFCP Stance on Orlando: The AR-15 is “semi-automatic”, and an M-16 (militarized AR-15) is “automatic”. Liberals always want to take away everyone’s guns, but don’t even know the very definite differences between military and civilian firearms. France, Belgium, Denmark, Sweden, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Austria, Finland, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Russia allow their citizens to own AR-15 (semi-automatic) rifles for personal use as long as they get a class B permit. A class B permit is a “Shall Issue” permit in all of these countries if the citizen passes a background check, and in some countries like Russia, a psychological evaluation. The following European and European commonwealth countries have very serious restrictions on them if not an out-right ban on them and other guns: United Kingdom, Scotland, Australia, Canada, Ireland, and South Africa (basically countries from the “Realm of Great Britain.”). Their violent crime rates are higher than the U.S.

According to the website Gun Facts you can find the following information in addition to a mountain of further evidence debunking gun control. Fact: According to the U.N. Office on Drugs and Crime in 2010, the top 100 countries for homicide do not include the U.S, and the top ten countries all have near or total firearm bans. Fact: According to the Dutch Ministry of Justice in 2001 the U.S. has a violent crime rate lower than 12 of seventeen industrialized countries due in large part to the 2.5 million annual defense gun uses.

The problem is not guns, and banning guns won’t stop terrorism. If you want to change the terrorism escalation in the United States, you have to change the way you think. The Obama administration sympathizes with Islamic ideologies and everyone knows it. His administration quells the voice and actions of our Homeland Security thereby allowing the radicalization of Muslims. This is why this problem will not disappear, but get larger. He and his administration are a big part of the problem. You have to first realistically identify the threat, and then realistically identify the weaknesses in the threat. Once these are done then attack the weaknesses in the most unmerciful way possible. You must not stop until the entire threat is eradicated. Most U.S. citizens do not have the stomach for this last part because they have never served in the military and don’t understand the price for liberty and freedom.

In a nutshell we need to do the following: 1.) Identify the Threat: Radical Islam is behind the terrorism in the U.S., and abroad. Non-radical Islamists refuse to assist us in eradicating this threat because of the religious ties they have with them. That being the case a well-known general once said: “The friend of my enemy is my enemy”. Non-radical Muslim organizations, un-cooperating mosques, and un-cooperating Muslim populace are not willing to assimilate into our society. They instead want society to change to their religion or suffer death (according to the Koran). 2.) Identify the Weaknesses: The Muslim weakness is their radical religion, and the desire to bring others into that religion. They also hide money sources and wealth. Their money is used to support Jihad. 3.) Attack the weaknesses: Disallow them from immigrating to the U.S. Do not take any refugees from any Islamic country. All past Muslim refugees must be sent back to their originating country. Disallow Sharia Law in the U.S. Instead of respecting their religion defame it (like they do with Christianity). Instead of allowing them to play nice during Ramadan, bring the battle to them by disrespecting them (like they do with Christianity during Christmas season). When they want to worship in their Mosques cause noise and disharmony (like they do with Christianity). When they want to wear clothing that covers their face force them to remove it by pulling it from their faces. Profile all Muslims as radical Muslims; do not try to differentiate from non-radicals. Place the Muslim religion at the top of a “Radical Watch List” (like the government does with Christianity). Don’t allow Muslims to be judges, lawyers, or scientists or attend our education system or universities. Ban them from owning land, or holding government positions and military service. Treat them as second class citizens. If all these things don’t hurt them enough to want to leave the U.S. then mandate the execution of all known terrorists and seize their family’s assets before deporting these families.

Zero Tolerance is the operative word here. Anyone not willing to allow what I’ve listed here will always have to look over their shoulder because radical Islamic terrorism is a religion, an ideology, a way to bring the battle to us, and they will not stop until they win. I know some of you reading this will think “this guy who wrote this is a Nazi!” I’m a Christian, not a Nazi. The Nazis killed Jews, homosexuals, the infirmed, the elderly, and others not because of the terroristic tendencies but because they were in the way and would not capitulate! Radical Muslims are terrorists! Their Muslim Sharia laws allow them to lie, cheat, steal, kill, and put into bondage any non-Muslims they choose. My last note on this is to absolutely never trust any Muslim ever!

Boats

06/12/16

Pass The Torch and Peas Please

     Hi, my online handle is “Boats”, and I’ll be the new administrator. This site is owned by “Cb4life”. It is becoming difficult for him to maintain it because of his ongoing health issues. Cb4life has given me the responsibility to maintain the site as administrator until he is in better health. Sometimes we all need to turn a page and start the next chapter in the story. That being said, there will be no major changes to the site in the foreseeable future. It will be administered as it is. I will be making a post to the site weekly unless something unforeseen happens. Current events, radio and TV media, politics and religion, and our great and loved Constitution will be the mainstay of conversation on this site, but I’m open to suggestion. I never pull any punches with regards to my personal opinions, although I try to keep my writing civil in most respects. I don’t want contributors to pull punches either,… just keep it civil. I am a Constitutional Conservative; I never miss an opportunity to vote in local, state, or federal elections. I am drawn to the Constitution (as it was written by our forefathers) and have put my life on the line to defend it against those that threaten it. I’m a war veteran and served from 1977 to 1998. I have a low tolerance for unbridled liberals. There is a saying that I believe; “Nothing changes if nothing changes!” I encourage anyone else that feels this way to let me know via post or comment. Now for today’s post.

In addition to online sources I also listen to radio and TV media as a research source. Much of what I believe, and hold dear are the same stated core beliefs that “conservative media” articulate. Many of these sources change their opinions as fast as the Missouri weather. I assess people extremely well and know a boot licking schmoozer when I see, or hear one, as I saw thousands of them in the service. I listen to radio daily during my morning and evening commute to my regular job. I have witnessed radio celebrities’ flip-flop back and forth on various issues so they could move up the ladder of fame from radio to TV. They are sell-outs. They are not objective, and no different than those they initiate venomous talking points about. They have the luxury of having research people to gather stories from other sources to first cherry-pick, and then load into their talking points machine gun. They often try to bring interracial integrity to their programming by allowing the voice of diversity to get air-time, and then they deliberately limit that exposure when it benefits them, or when asked to support one of their causes. These radio media people are actually equal opportunity pimps. They pimp equal opportunity time using the disguise of limited broadcasting time. I know who they are and I maintained my silence for as long as I could. They, and their media show are EO pimps and they know it. I’ll continue to listen to them as “commute noise” to hear where they’re coming from on the “EO Pimp Scale”, and then comment about them. Their research monkeys at the unnamed radio station will be held to the test of their own device. I’m watching you J.A., and because you can’t stop doing what you do, you’ll make it easy for me.

Boats

06/2/16

Why are we even having the conversation

It has been a very long time that  I have wrote here. In part I had little  to say,and or heath problems. I pray and hope my friends and non-supporters have not gave up.

I just find it hard to believe that any country that stood for a small part of truth in the American way. Would in fact consider THIS woman to lead this country And lead to what?

This “leader” you are looking at not only murdered on her orders but documented . And is on live tape of her saying “she would go after the movie the was the cause of it, It was NOT terrorist” Knowing it was. Even the court of good sense shows she is a liar.

To stand in the face of those she  the (p)resident and his people, told alone at the TARWAX with flag covered.Tell the parents of these men and women they are the liars. This is the one you would vote in?

I will not even  begin to start on her emails, or the billions that she happened to lose, giving of ton of enrich nuc. product that now Iran has. Or that she pays the women who work for her less than men that do. Nor will I talk of he husband she says she will give NAFTA  and debt control. (kiss ss goodbye, how he made it work last time)

Just look an listen to what you say is ok in  the leader you?want. The Santa that want to give away ever thing,

Now that Trump guy. He is NOT a conservative that we are told is Conservative. He IS an AMERICAN for America. I do not like a lot for what he says. He has not fought in a war, but is as close to J.F.K. and Eisnhorr were to American.

He wants to check the fed and slowly return to gold standards. (thats’ what got J.F.K. killed)He wants to replace MUCH of the government that does not work weather budget is made at all

Spelling is getting harder fro me now without  going back so much.

Don’t get me wrong I will take American over the other choice’s. Ah yes I remember choice and not who my Union  or someone told me I needed.

These are my choice’s.